Case 4104133/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A McAnulty v Hair Internacionale Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104133/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A McAnulty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent. Employment Judge P O’Donnell determined that Ms A McAnulty had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered Hair Internacionale Limited to pay damages of £2,955.60 for that breach of contract claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,773.25. The judgment records no additional reasoning beyond the rule 21 disposal and the two monetary awards, and it does not identify any other claims or remedies.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,955.60. | Upheld | — | £2,956 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,773.25. | Upheld | — | £6,773 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,729
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.