Case 4104144/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Ronald v Mikeylenn Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104144/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Ronald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge M Whitcombe issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Mikeylenn Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms F Ronald's wages and ordered payment of £873.90.
The tribunal also found that Ms Ronald had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £349.56. It further found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £436.88.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay Ms Ronald's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £172.56. The monetary awards stated in the judgment total £1,832.90.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £874 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £437 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £173 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,833
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.