Case 4104158/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M McKie v Juniper Hospitality Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104158/2018
- Decision date
- 15 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M McKie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Miss M McKie's claim against Juniper Hospitality Limited, trading as Juniper Bar and Restaurant. Employment Judge Muriel Robison found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £414.19, calculated as 58.75 hours worked at £7.05 per hour.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £592.20, calculated as 84 hours at £7.05 per hour. The hearing listed for 4 July 2018 was cancelled. No separate award of interest or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £414.19, said to represent 58.75 hours worked at £7.05 per hour. | Upheld | — | £414 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £592.20, said to represent 84 hours at £7.05 per hour. | Upheld | — | £592 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,006
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.