Case 4104168/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4104168/2020 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on February 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Ms E Doherty v Walker Precision Engineering Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104168/2020
- Decision date
- 20 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4104168/2020 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on February 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Ms E Doherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Doherty was employed by Walker Precision Engineering Ltd from 4 July 2017. The respondent found that the holiday tracker had been altered on 21 February 2020 using the claimant's log-in details, after a period when the spreadsheet had not been password protected. The claimant was investigated, invited to a disciplinary hearing, and then dismissed for gross misconduct on 21 May 2020, with her appeal later dismissed on 10 June 2020.
Applying section 98(4) ERA 1996 and the Burchell approach, the tribunal held that the respondent had a genuine belief that the claimant had committed misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and had carried out as much investigation as was reasonable in the circumstances. It relied on the documentary evidence showing the claimant's log-in being used, the absence of evidence that another person had accessed her workstation, and the fact that the claimant did not raise until after dismissal that she had been outside the building at the material time. The tribunal also found the investigation, disciplinary hearing and appeal process fair, including the delay caused by annual leave and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. On pay and holiday pay, the tribunal accepted the respondent's calculations that the claimant was entitled to 113 hours of holiday but had taken 136 hours, leaving no further holiday pay due. It also found that the claimant had later been paid 18 hours of flexitime pay on 10 February 2021, so no further sums were due on that head either.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal accepted misconduct as the reason for dismissal and found both the process and the decision to dismiss fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Combined pay and holiday pay claim. The tribunal found no further sums were due, noting that 18 hours of flexitime pay had been paid on 10 February 2021 and that the claimant had taken 136 hours of holiday against an entitlement of 113 hours. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- band of reasonable responses
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Foley v Post Office
- HSBC Bank v Madden
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.