Case 4104172/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mikeylenn Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104172/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge M Whitcombe decided the case without a hearing on the papers and entered judgment on 22 October 2020, with the decision copied to the parties on 20 November 2020.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,451. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,530.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £327. The extracted judgment does not record any separate interest award or other remedy beyond those three sums, giving a total monetary award of £4,308.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £2,451. | Upheld | — | £2,451 |
| Redundancy | Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was found entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,530. | Upheld | — | £1,530 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £327. | Upheld | — | £327 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,308
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.