Case 4104175/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4104175/2020 Mr R Flynn v Mikeylenn Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104175/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4104175/2020 Mr R Flynn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,020.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £318. In addition, the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of £121 for that head of claim. The judgment does not record any separate basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other remedy breakdown beyond those three sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent presented no response. Under Rule 21, the Employment Judge found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,020. | Upheld | — | £1,020 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £318. | Upheld | — | £318 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £121. | Upheld | — | £121 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,459
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.