Case 4104196/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Mills v Stella Brodie t/a Grouchos — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104196/2020
- Decision date
- 14 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr F Mills worked for Grouchos from 1 May 1995 as manager. The tribunal accepted that after the death of Mr Brodie the respondent, his widow, took over the business and that the claimant and three colleagues transferred to her employment under TUPE on 1 August 2020. The store had closed on 21 March 2020 when the Covid lockdown began, the respondent continued to pay wages while trade was suspended, and on 14 June 2020 she told a colleague that the claimant and the others' employment was ending and that no notice or redundancy payments would be made. The claimant had weekly gross pay of £450, was 62 at termination, and had taken no holiday in the relevant holiday year.
On the unopposed evidence, the tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy because the respondent had ceased to operate from the premises and the requirement for employees to do the work had ceased. It applied the statutory redundancy provisions and the presumption in s.163(2) ERA 1996, and awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £13,500 based on 25 years' service, capped at 20 years for calculation purposes, with 20 years counted at 1.5 weeks' pay per year because the claimant was over 41 for those years.
The tribunal also held that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to provide the 12 weeks' notice incorporated by s.86(4) ERA 1996. The claimant had normal working hours, made reasonable efforts to mitigate his loss, and had no replacement income during the notice period, so damages were assessed at £5,400. A further award of £2,520 gross was made for accrued untaken holiday outstanding at termination, calculated as 5.6 weeks' leave at £450 per week and enforced as an unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 and Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The sums awarded were expressed gross of tax and national insurance, and the total award was £21,420.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded after the tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy; 25 years' service, weekly pay £450, age 62 at termination. | Upheld | — | £13,500 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to give the 12 weeks' statutory minimum notice incorporated by s.86(4) ERA 1996; calculated at 12 weeks' pay of £450 per week. | Upheld | — | £5,400 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid accrued untaken holiday at termination, treated as an unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 and Reg 14 WTR 1998; 5.6 weeks x £450 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,520 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,420
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.163(2) ERA 1996 presumption of redundancy
- s.139(1)(a) and (b) ERA 1996
- s.86(4) ERA 1996 incorporated notice term
- Westwood v Secretary of State for Employment
- Secretary of State for Employment v Wilson
- Reg 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.13 ERA 1996
- Greater Glasgow Health Board v Lamont
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.