Case 4104197/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Scott v Stella Brodie t/a Grouchos — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104197/2020
- Decision date
- 14 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Scott had worked for Alistair Brodie trading as Grouchos from 25 August 2010 as a general shop assistant. After Mr Brodie died on 31 July 2020, the respondent, his widow, took over the business. The tribunal found that the claimant and his three colleagues transferred to the respondent under TUPE on 1 August 2020. The shop had already closed on 21 March 2020 because of the Covid lockdown, but the respondent continued to pay the claimant's weekly wage of £320 until 12 June 2020. On 14 June 2020 the respondent told Ms Rogers that she was terminating the employment of the claimant and his colleagues and did not intend to pay notice or redundancy sums. The respondent did not attend or lead evidence, and the tribunal accepted the evidence of the claimant and his former colleagues as credible.
Applying ss.135, 139 and 163(2) ERA 1996, the tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy because the respondent had ceased to operate from the premises where he had worked and the requirements of the business for employees to carry out that work had ceased. It therefore awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,920, calculated by reference to nine complete years' service, a weekly pay figure of £320, and the age-related multipliers set out in the judgment.
The tribunal also held that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to give any statutory minimum notice under s.86(4) ERA 1996. It accepted that he had normal working hours and had made reasonable efforts to mitigate his loss, but received no replacement income during the nine-week notice period, so it awarded damages of £2,880. It further found that as at 14 June 2020 the claimant had used none of his annual leave entitlement and was owed 5.6 weeks' holiday on termination, awarding £1,792 gross in respect of accrued untaken holiday under reg. 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and s.13 ERA 1996. The total award was £6,592 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded after the tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of redundancy following cessation of the business at the premises. | Upheld | — | £1,920 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for failure to give the statutory minimum notice period incorporated by s.86(4) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,880 |
| Holiday pay | Award for 5.6 weeks' accrued untaken holiday on termination, treated in the judgment as an unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996 and reg. 14 WTR 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,792 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,592
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.135 ERA 1996
- s.139(1)(a)/(b) ERA 1996
- s.163(2) ERA 1996
- Greater Glasgow Health Board v Lamont
- s.86(4) ERA 1996
- s.88(1)(a)/(b) ERA 1996
- Westwood v Secretary of State for Employment
- Secretary of State for Employment v Wilson
- Reg 14 WTR 1998
- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.