Case 4104209/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104209/2020 Ms B Philliben v Dental Surgery Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104209/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104209/2020 Ms B Philliben
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal recorded that Ms B Philliben’s complaints of unfair dismissal, unlawful discrimination because of pregnancy/maternity, and sums deducted for accrued but untaken holiday pay succeeded. The judgment does not set out the factual findings or reasoning in detail, but it records those claims as upheld by the tribunal.
The same judgment states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled, together with the claims in respect of redundancy pay and statutory maternity pay, would be determined at the hearing listed for 7 October 2020. No monetary award is fixed in this decision, and no split between heads of loss is recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as sums deducted for accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.