Case 4104211/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Wylie v Yes Recycling (Fife) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104211/2023
- Decision date
- 20 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Wylie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material by Employment Judge M Robison. The tribunal recorded that no response had been presented within the applicable time limit, that the respondent was in administration, and that the administrator had consented to the continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 16 October 2023. The claimant was found entitled to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives, and he was an employee dismissed as redundant.
The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed more than 20 employees as redundant at one establishment within 90 days or less. It further found that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A, and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The complaint under sections 188 and 188A was therefore well founded.
The tribunal made a protective award in respect of employees dismissed at the respondent’s workplace at Lomond House, Whitehill Industrial Estate, Glenrothes, Fife, KY6 2QZ, and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period. The protected period was stated to begin on 2 June 2023 and to last for 90 days. The extracted text does not state a monetary figure for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found the complaint under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well founded and made a protective award. The judgment records a protected period of 90 days beginning on 2 June 2023, but no monetary amount is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.188A TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.