Case 4104213/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr SA Naimi v Serbajar Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104213/2018
- Decision date
- 14 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr SA Naimi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lucy Wiseman issued a Rule 21 judgment in Mr SA Naimi's claim against Serbajar Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,310. It also found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and ordered £1,843.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars and ordered £748, and had failed to provide rest breaks and ordered £2,000. The hearing listed for 6 July 2018 was cancelled. The total amount ordered by the judgment was £6,901.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,310 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was found well founded. | Upheld | — | £1,843 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £748 |
| Working time regulations | The respondent failed to provide the claimant with rest breaks. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,901
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.