Case 4104217/2016 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr Graham Baird v Trading Name Of John Campbell LLP and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104217/2016
- Decision date
- 11 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr Graham Baird
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 10 April 2017, Employment Judge I McFatridge sitting alone determined that the claimant's employer was JC 1991 LLP, the Seventh Respondent, formerly known as Diligentia Mason LLP. The tribunal held that the claim should proceed against that respondent.
The written judgment records that the claim so far as directed against the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Respondents was dismissed. The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but those reasons are not set out in the written text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing decision on correct respondent/employer only. The tribunal held that the claimant's employer was JC 1991 LLP, formerly known as Diligentia Mason LLP, and that the claim should proceed against the Seventh Respondent. The claim against the First to Sixth Respondents was dismissed. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.