Case 4104227/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Jeanette McKenna v Functional Healthcare Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4104227/2025
- Decision date
- 22 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Doctor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jeanette McKenna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented by Functional Healthcare Ltd. Employment Judge M Kearns Doctor therefore issued judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the available material.
The Tribunal found that Jeanette McKenna was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of contractual notice and awarded £9,588 gross, calculated as 12 weeks at £799 gross per week. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,392.50, calculated as 7.5 weeks at the statutory cap of £719 per week.
The Tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £19.02 gross, calculated as 0.5 hours at £38.04 gross per hour. The three awards total £14,999.52.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9,588 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,393 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £19 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.