Case 4104228/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Hunter v Greater Glasgow Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104228/2018
- Decision date
- 29 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Hunter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant submitted a claim on 24 April 2018. The Tribunal recorded that there appeared to have been no contact from the claimant to the Tribunal after that date, despite letters being sent to her home address about acknowledgement of the claim, acceptance of the response, case management orders, date listing stencils, and the notice of hearing for 28-30 January 2019.
The respondent's representative had contact with the claimant in January 2019 about preparation for the hearing, including emails about the bundle, chronology and compliance with orders, and a telephone conversation on or around 14 January 2019.
The claimant did not attend the hearing on 28 January 2019. After the Tribunal clerk telephoned the claimant and the claimant hung up after the hearing was explained, the Tribunal considered the available information and dismissed the claim in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment identifies the claim through the listing context as unfair dismissal and dismisses the claim under Rule 47 due to the claimant's failure to attend or be represented at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.