Case 4104238/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104238/2024 Miss K Garry v Macfarlane Meat Products Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104238/2024
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104238/2024 Miss K Garry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss Garry's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). A strike-out warning letter was sent on 30 July 2024. The claimant replied by email on 31 July 2024 saying that she could not go further with the case.
The tribunal then wrote on 1 August 2024 to confirm whether she wished to withdraw the claim, and sent a further reminder on 14 August 2024 asking for a response by 19 August 2024. No reply was received to either letter, and the claimant did not request a hearing or provide reasons why strike out should not be ordered. The judgment records no substantive merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The extracted text says the response was required by 13 August 2023, which appears inconsistent with the surrounding 2024 chronology and is likely a typographical error in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.