Case 4104246/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs AM Tague v The Kindmans Public House Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4104246/2025
- Decision date
- 25 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs AM Tague
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined by Employment Judge M Whitcombe under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, no response having been presented by the respondent. The Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,637.36 gross, calculated on the basis of 13 years' service. The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £2,344.32 gross, reflecting 12 weeks' statutory notice, which exceeded the contractual entitlement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £2,637.36 gross based on 13 years' service. | Upheld | — | £2,637 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in respect of notice; 12 weeks statutory notice exceeded the contractual entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,344 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,982
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.