Case 4104248/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mitchell v Scot Direct Construction & Maintenance Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104248/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mitchell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so Employment Judge D Hoey issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for 11 weeks' pay, leaving £1,584.28 gross due after taking account of two payments on account totalling £835.72. The tribunal also awarded £250 gross by way of notice pay and £400 gross for unpaid holiday pay, calculated at £50 for 8 days.
The judgment therefore upheld the monetary claims in full and ordered payment of a total of £2,234.28 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found 11 weeks' pay remained due. The gross sum of £1,584.28 took account of two payments on account totalling £835.72. | Upheld | — | £1,584 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered damages in the gross sum of £250 by way of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered £400 for unpaid holiday pay, calculated as £50 for 8 days. | Upheld | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,234
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.