Case 4104250/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Allma Construction Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104250/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant lodged the claim on 10 August 2020. The Tribunal accepted it by letter dated 11 August 2020 and asked for availability for a hearing. On 8 September 2020 the claimant was asked for views on whether the hearing could be conducted by Cloud Video Platform, and a reminder was sent on 5 October 2020. The Tribunal recorded that it received no reply and no further correspondence from the claimant.
On 28 November 2020 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 December 2020 or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because the claimant did not respond to Tribunal correspondence or give reasons why the claim should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.