Case 4104256/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Conti v Taypark House — 2026
- Case reference
- 4104256/2025
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Conti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The sum awarded was the gross amount of £256.41. The judgment states that this figure was calculated on the basis of 60 hours paid at £12.21 per hour, giving £732.60, less the amount actually paid of £476.19. The respondent was given liberty to make any required deductions for income tax and employee national insurance contributions before payment, provided the deductions were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was given to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No response was presented. The Employment Judge issued judgment under Rule 22 on the available material and found an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £256
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.