Case 4104259/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104259/2020 Ms L Cunningham v Hair Internacionale Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104259/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104259/2020 Ms L Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Laura Doherty issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal therefore determined the case without a hearing on the basis of the documents before it, and entered judgment on 9 October 2020.
The judgment records that Ms L Cunningham was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and orders Hair Internacionale Limited to pay damages of £2,955.60. It also records that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment; the extracted text shows this amount as £6.273, which has been structured here as £6,273.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,955.60. | Upheld | — | £2,956 |
| Redundancy | The extracted judgment text reads £6.273; this has been structured as £6,273 on the basis that the figure is plainly intended to be a thousands amount. | Upheld | — | £6,273 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,229
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.