Case 4104263/2020 · Employment Tribunal

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104263/2020 (A) Mr A MacKenzie v Represented by: Mr B McLaughlin, Solicitor Mr G Mitchelson and 2 others — 2020

Case reference: 4104263/2020
Decision date: 22 October 2020
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Alexander Kemp

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104263/2020 (A) Mr A MacKenzie

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment is a short procedural disposal only. It records that the claim directed against the third respondent had been withdrawn by the claimant.

The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim against the third respondent only under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability findings are recorded and no remedy is awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the claim as directed against the third respondent had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed as against the third respondent only under Rule 52.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.