Case 4104271/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R McLaren v Caledonian Bar st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104271/2018
- Decision date
- 4 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R McLaren
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not enter a response to the claim form, which had been sent on 3 May 2018, and the Employment Judge decided on the available material that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints succeeded in respect of arrears of pay, holiday pay due on termination, and breach of contract for notice pay. In the reasons, the judge identified these as unpaid wages for 4.5 hours worked on 12 March 2018, unpaid annual leave for 34 hours between 14 November 2017 and 12 March 2018, and one week’s notice pay.
The award was calculated on the basis of £7.50 per hour. The tribunal awarded £27 net for unpaid wages, £204 net for unpaid annual leave, and £96 net for notice pay, producing a total award of £327. The judge also recorded that the claimant was not entitled to compensation for emotional distress or any other heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment’s reasons treat this as unpaid wages for 4.5 hours worked on 12 March 2018, calculated at £7.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £27 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment’s reasons treat this as unpaid annual leave/holiday pay on termination for 34 hours between 14 November 2017 and 12 March 2018. | Upheld | — | £204 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay for one week, described in the reasons as 16 hours at £7.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £96 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £327
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.