Case 4104276/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104276/2020 & others Mr C G Thomson v Mr R Whyte Greystone Carbon Reduction Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104276/2020
- Decision date
- 24 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McPherson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104276/2020 & others Mr C G Thomson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 24 September 2020, Employment Judge I McPherson issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response to the claim form that had been sent on 13 August 2020. The tribunal decided that, on the material available, liability could properly be determined without a hearing, but remedy could not be decided at that stage.
The tribunal upheld the claimants' complaints of unfair dismissal, discrimination on the grounds of disability, failure to pay notice pay, and failure to pay holiday pay. The judgment does not record any monetary award. It states that the remedy due to the claimants would be determined by an Employment Judge at a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as failure to pay notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.