Case 4104286/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N MacKay v Antler Limited - in Administration — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104286/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whltcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N MacKay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that on 14 May 2021 the claimant was told that consent of the Court was required to proceed with the claim, and was directed to update the Tribunal within 28 days on any steps taken to obtain that consent. When no reply was received, the Tribunal issued further reminders on 20 October 2021 and 17 November 2021, and on 30 November 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 December 2021 or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
No response was received to any of those communications. The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made or to request a hearing, and therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits or any award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37(1)(d) on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The extracted text does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s), so this is recorded as other. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.