Case 4104305/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Niosi v Interpreters: Ms S Ricci Mr J Oya Claremont Park Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104305/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland Jessica
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Niosi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJessica Niosi and Hector Andres Roman Ihla were employed as duty managers from 13 February 2020 until their resignations effective 21 June 2020. Their employment changed by agreement to zero-hours contracts from 13 March 2020. Their final net wages due for the fortnight ending 21 June 2020, including accrued but untaken holiday pay, were agreed at £554.31 for Ms Niosi and £526.57 for Mr Ihla. The Respondent deducted those sums, citing failure to return master keys, damage to a window, and other losses.
The Tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the Claimants left the master keys on a desk in the hotel office when they resigned, that neither the manager nor the owner received them, and that the loss of the keys created a security issue requiring replacement of the lock system. It accepted the invoices showing a total cost of £2,500 for replacement of the keys and locks. The Tribunal held that the contractual term permitting deductions for loss or damage caused by the Claimants' carelessness or negligence applied, and that the Respondent was entitled to deduct that cost from their final wages.
The Tribunal also found that a window frame had been damaged and repaired at a cost of £300, but there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the Claimants caused that damage when they left. Applying section 13 ERA 1996, the Tribunal concluded that there had been no unlawful deduction from wages in either case and dismissed both claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First Claimant Jessica Niosi. The agreed net final wages due were £554.31, and the Respondent deducted the full amount. The Tribunal found that the master keys had been left on an office desk, that the Respondent incurred £2,500 in replacing the lock system, and that the contractual deduction clause authorised deduction for loss or damage caused by the Claimant's carelessness or negligence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second Claimant Hector Andres Roman Ihla. The agreed net final wages due were £526.57, and the Respondent deducted the full amount. The Tribunal found that the master keys had been left on an office desk, that the Respondent incurred £2,500 in replacing the lock system, and that the contractual deduction clause authorised deduction for loss or damage caused by the Claimant's carelessness or negligence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
- s.14 ERA 1996
- s.23(5) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.