Case 4104305/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Swan v Martin James Hutchinson — 2023
- Case reference
- 4104305/2023
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Swan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Swan appeared in person. The respondent, Martin James Hutchinson, did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal, sitting in Glasgow and giving oral reasons on 14 December 2023, held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,049.60 for that holiday entitlement, calculated as 146.4 hours at £14 gross per hour. It also found that the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment.
For that breach, the tribunal awarded two weeks' pay, assessed at £840 using the figure of £14 per hour and a 30-hour week. The judgment therefore records total awards of £2,049.60 and £840.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,049.60, being 146.4 hours at £14 gross per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,050 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment and awarded two weeks' pay of £840, calculated as 2 x £14 x 30. | Upheld | — | £840 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,890
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.