Case 4104306/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brian Shonna v No appearance Abbey Architectural Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104306/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Glasgow remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brian Shonna
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Brian Shonna brought claims against Abbey Architectural Services Ltd that originally included unfair dismissal and a statutory redundancy payment, together with claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract. The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment claims were dismissed because he did not have the service needed to pursue them.
The case was listed for a final hearing on 11 April 2024, held remotely from Glasgow. The claimant did not attend. The respondent appeared through Mr Ian Balfour. The tribunal noted that the clerk telephoned the claimant four times on the number given on the claim form without success, and also emailed him with the hearing information again.
The tribunal had previously ordered the parties to exchange documents no later than 28 days before the hearing, but the claimant had not done so. Having regard to Rule 47, the claimant's failure to attend, the lack of supporting documents, and the fact that he had not contacted the respondent, Employment Judge A Kemp dismissed the claim in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 2.
The written judgment therefore records dismissal of the remaining claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract, as well as the earlier dismissal of the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment claims for lack of qualifying service.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal recorded that the claimant did not have the service required to bring the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the tribunal recorded that the claimant did not have the service required to bring the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and had not exchanged documents or contacted the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and had not exchanged documents or contacted the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.