Case 4104318/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104318/2024 Mr S Kilaru v House of Arran — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104318/2024
- Decision date
- 1 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104318/2024 Mr S Kilaru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not identify any substantive determination of the underlying claim; the disposal was procedural only.
On 16 October 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 30 October 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why strike out should not be ordered and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not restate the substantive cause of action; classification as working_time follows the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.