Case 4104321/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104321/2024 Mr Z Karlsons v Linnet Onboard Catering Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104321/2024
- Decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104321/2024 Mr Z Karlsons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, so no response had been presented and the Employment Judge decided the case on the available material. The tribunal found that Linnet Onboard Catering Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Z Karlsons’ wages and ordered payment of £881.22 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded damages of £1,873.42 gross. It further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,341.70 gross.
Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £752.74 gross. The judgment states that the respondent may deduct income tax and employee NIC from the sums payable if required by law, and that payment of the balance will satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £881 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice; award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £1,873 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy; award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £2,342 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £753 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,849
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.