Case 4104364/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104364/2022 Mr N Scott v Washington Logistics Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104364/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104364/2022 Mr N Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because the respondent presented no response. Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe determined the claim without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 14 October 2022.
The tribunal found that Washington Logistics Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr N Scott's wages and ordered it to pay £1,876.51. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered it to pay £1,340.05.
No separate findings were recorded on liability beyond those two statutory money claims, and no additional remedy breakdown was set out. The total sum ordered by the judgment is £3,216.56.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent entered no response. Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,876.51. | Upheld | — | £1,877 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; respondent entered no response. Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,340.05. | Upheld | — | £1,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,217
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.