Case 4104383/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Schuh Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104383/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Preliminary Hearing held by CVP in Edinburgh on 7 December 2022, Employment Judge Sangster gave oral reasons and determined the claimant's complaints of wrongful dismissal and breach of contract. The tribunal held that both complaints should be struck out under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because they had no reasonable prospects of success. The judgment was entered in the register on 13 December 2022 and copied to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Struck out at a Preliminary Hearing under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Struck out at a Preliminary Hearing under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.