Case 4104409/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104409/2020 Mr Raymond Leggat v The Kained Immaculate Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4104409/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104409/2020 Mr Raymond Leggat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available information under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr Raymond Leggat, was entitled to outstanding wages of £5,057.81.
The tribunal also awarded outstanding holiday pay of £1,259.52 and notice pay of £326.31. No separate liability reasoning is set out beyond the Rule 21 disposal, and the judgment does not identify any contested factual findings or legal tests applied.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £6,643.64. The judgment is brief and contains no split between different heads of remedy beyond the three sums listed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as 'outstanding wages' in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,058 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as 'outstanding holiday pay' in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as 'notice pay' in a Rule 21 judgment; classified here as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £326 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,644
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.