Case 4104424/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lynda Lumanze v Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104424/2020
- Decision date
- 20 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lynda Lumanze
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered procedural applications at a telephone conference call held on 4 March 2021. It refused the application for strike out under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and refused the application for a deposit order under Rule 39.
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to amend the ET3. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records procedural applications only: the respondent's applications for strike out and a deposit order were refused, and its application to amend the ET3 was allowed. The extracted judgment text does not identify or determine the substantive claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 39 Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.