Case 4104468/2018 · Employment Tribunal
A Kemp Members: Mrs S Taylor Ms V Lockhart Mr W Allan v Represented by:15 Mr D McGregor Lay Representative Mr N Buchan and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104468/2018
- Decision date
- 28 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Aberdeen
- Panel members
- Mrs S Taylor, Ms V Lockhart, Mr W Allan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
A Kemp Members: Mrs S Taylor Ms V Lockhart Mr W Allan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Wallace Allan was employed by N Buchan Ceilings, a firm trading under a partnership of Norman Buchan, Anne Ritchie Buchan and Elaine Buchan. It rejected the asserted 2013 change to a reduced-hours and goodwill arrangement, the alleged change of employer to Elaine Buchan as sole trader, and the alleged resignations said to have occurred in March 2018. The tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence and records, and found the respondents' account and late-produced documents unreliable.
The effective date of termination was 2 May 2018. The tribunal was satisfied that there was a dismissal, and that it was a constructive dismissal under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found the reason for dismissal was redundancy. The dismissal was unfair because there had been no real consultation or fair process. The tribunal awarded the claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £15,240 and a compensatory award of £6,910.27; no basic award was made because of the redundancy payment, and no future loss was awarded after the tribunal applied Polkey.
The tribunal also awarded £1,848.56 for unpaid wages from 1 April 2018 to 2 May 2018 and £132.04 for holiday pay accrued over the same period. It found the respondents were in breach of contract in relation to unpaid employer national insurance contributions and pension contributions, quantified at £4,162 and £334.75 respectively, making £4,496.75 in total. Separate awards of £2,032 were made for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars and for failure to provide itemised pay statements. The TUPE claims were dismissed because the tribunal found there had been no relevant transfer, and no award was made for claimed tax liability or for incorrect or late P45/P60 forms.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found a dismissal on 2 May 2018 and was satisfied it was a constructive dismissal under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996. It held the reason was redundancy and that the dismissal was unfair because there had been no real consultation or fair process. The compensatory award was reduced by a £300 benefit in kind and no basic award was made because of the redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,910 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at the maximum figure of £15,240, using 21 years' service, age 61, and a capped week's pay of £508. | Upheld | — | £15,240 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unpaid wages from 1 April 2018 to 2 May 2018. The tribunal accepted that the sums remained outstanding and rejected the explanation that they had been paid by bank error. | Upheld | — | £1,849 |
| Holiday pay | Award for holiday pay accrued from 1 April 2018 to 2 May 2018, quantified as 2.3 days' pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £132 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in relation to unpaid employer national insurance contributions and pension contributions. The tribunal quantified the loss at £4,162 for the NIC shortfall and £334.75 for pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £4,497 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,692
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,910
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.95(1)(a) and s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- Malik trust and confidence term
- Geys v Societe Generale elective theory
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services
- s.139 and s.163 ERA 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 14
- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.