Case 4104481/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104481/2022 Mr D Dimosthenous v Carmeleon ARC Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104481/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104481/2022 Mr D Dimosthenous
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the Employment Judge found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, and ordered payment of the gross balance of £600.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were awarded in the net sum of £678.30, calculated by reference to 2 weeks at £339.15 net weekly pay.
A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of £573.00 gross, calculated as 57.30 hours at £10 per hour. The hearing listed for 25 October 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross balance of £600.00. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the net sum of £678.30, calculated as 2 weeks at £339.15 net weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £678 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £573.00 gross, calculated as 57.30 hours at £10 per hour. | Upheld | — | £573 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,851
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.