Case 4104499/2018 · Employment Tribunal
5 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: S/4104499/2018 Held in Glasgow on October 2018 Employment Judge: J D Young v Represented by:- Mr B McLaughlin - Solicitor Mr J Farrell — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104499/2018
- Decision date
- 14 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
5 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: S/4104499/2018 Held in Glasgow on October 2018 Employment Judge: J D Young
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant originally lodged claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, sex discrimination and disability discrimination. By the time of this hearing, the disability discrimination complaint had been withdrawn and a separate judgment had already dismissed that complaint on 1 August 2018. The present decision therefore concerned the claimant's application to amend the ET1 so that the sex discrimination case was set out in full.
The tribunal held that the proposed amendment was more than mere relabelling and amounted to a new cause of action, but it also found that the core facts overlapped substantially with the unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal noted that the respondent's papers already addressed the rota, childcare arrangements, the discussions in August to December 2017, and the claimant's return to work, so the discrimination case would not require a wholly different factual enquiry.
On limitation, the tribunal found that the amended sex discrimination claim was raised on 26 June 2018 and would be out of time on that basis, but it did not refuse the amendment for that reason. It considered that there were grounds on which time might be extended on a just and equitable basis, although that issue remained live and would need to be resolved later. The tribunal therefore allowed the amendment, ordered the respondent to lodge a response within 28 days, and fixed a further telephone preliminary hearing for future procedure. No final merits decision was made on the unfair dismissal or sex discrimination claims in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination complaint had been withdrawn and a judgment was issued on 1 August 2018 dismissing it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal allowed amendment of the ET1 to particularise the sex discrimination claim; the merits and limitation issues were not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Abercrombie v Aga Rangemaster Limited
- Galilee v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Ladbrokes Racing Ltd v Traynor
- Transport and General Workers Union v Safeway Stores Ltd
- s.207B
- Edinburgh City Council v Kaur
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.