Case 4104531/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J McCann v The Phoenix Car Company Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104531/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J McCann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr McCann worked as a Sales Executive at the respondent's Glasgow branch from 1 October 2003 until 31 March 2018. In March 2018 the respondent decided to close the Glasgow branch and began a redundancy consultation process. The tribunal found that he was aged 63, was paid £415 per week, and had a contractual entitlement to 12 weeks' notice.
The tribunal held that the claimant's contract was terminated by the respondent when the Glasgow branch closed, so he had been dismissed within s.95(1)(a) ERA 1996. It also found that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy under s.139(1)(a) ERA 1996. The unfair dismissal claim failed because the respondent had consulted with him, tried to identify alternative employment, and made reasonable offers of work, including at Paisley. Applying s.98(4) ERA 1996, the tribunal concluded that the respondent acted reasonably in treating redundancy as a sufficient reason for dismissal.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's entitlement to a redundancy payment under s.141 ERA 1996. It found that suitable alternative employment had been offered before the end of his employment and that he unreasonably refused it. On the breach of contract claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had not given contractual notice of termination and awarded notice pay of £4,980, being 12 weeks at £415 per week.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy when the Glasgow branch closed, but held the dismissal was fair under s.98(4) ERA 1996 because the respondent consulted with him and made reasonable efforts to find alternative work. The tribunal also rejected entitlement to a redundancy payment under s.141 ERA 1996 because suitable alternative employment at Paisley was offered and unreasonably refused. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent did not give notice of termination as required by the claimant's contract, which entitled him to 12 weeks' notice. Notice pay was awarded at £4,980, calculated as 12 weeks at £415 per week. | Upheld | — | £4,980 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,980
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.95(1)(a) ERA 1996
- s.139(1)(a) ERA 1996
- s.98(2)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- s.141 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.