Case 4104538/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Simpson v No appearance or representation Fife Scottish Omnibuses Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104538/2024
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Simpson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on expenses in Dundee on 28 November 2024, Employment Judge A Kemp considered the respondent Fife Scottish Omnibuses Ltd's application for expenses after Miss S Simpson had withdrawn her claim on 22 November 2024, the last working day before a seven-day final hearing due to begin on 25 November 2024. The tribunal recorded that by then there were no supporting documents for liability or remedy, that the schedule of loss was at best inaccurate, and that there had been repeated non-compliance with tribunal orders.
The tribunal found that the claimant had conducted the proceedings unreasonably for the purposes of Rule 76(1)(a) and had been in material breach of orders within Rule 76(2). It relied on the history of breaches, the limited practical compliance achieved, the earlier warning as to expenses on 5 August 2024, and the absence of any explanation for the late withdrawal despite an opportunity to make written submissions after the tribunal's note of 16 December 2024.
In assessing quantum, the tribunal accepted the respondent's schedule as generally reasonable but excluded £1,284.50 for entries before 2 July 2024, a further £324 for four specified client-update and internal communication entries, and £500 as a broad reduction for the unless order and strike out applications. That left £6,936 from a total sought of £9,045.50. The tribunal made no award for VAT, noting that it would be recoverable separately under normal principles.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application for expenses under Rule 76 was granted. The tribunal ordered Miss S Simpson to pay Fife Scottish Omnibuses Ltd £6,936 after deductions from the respondent's schedule. | Upheld | — | £6,936 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,936
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
12 references- Rule 2 overriding objective
- Rule 74
- Rule 75
- Rule 76(1)(a)
- Rule 76(2)
- Rule 78(1)
- Rule 84
- Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Yerrakalva
- McPherson v BNP Paribas
- Osannaya v Queen Mary University
- Abaya v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
- Gee v Shell UK Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.