Case 4104542/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James MacMillan v Represented by:-10 Ms M Dalziel – Solicitor Jordan Electrics Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104542/2017
- Decision date
- 28 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James MacMillan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr James MacMillan resigned from Jordan Electrics Ltd on 16 June 2017. The respondent did not require him to work his notice and instead proposed pay in lieu. It then withheld £1,694 from his final pay, saying he had left a backlog of electrical certificates and that its handbook entitled it to recover costs arising from the claimant’s "blatant negligence". The tribunal accepted that the claimant was more likely than not to have received the Employee Handbook, but it also found that he had been working long days and evenings on the certificates and that the number of outstanding certificates had not been clearly explained.
The tribunal rejected the respondent’s case that the claimant’s conduct amounted to "blatant negligence" and rejected its loss case. It found there was no clear evidence as to why the backlog had built up, why the number of outstanding certificates appeared to move from 79 to 140 and then to 279, or how any recoverable loss was quantified. The tribunal accepted that Mr Dyet and Mr Cox worked on the certificates after the claimant left, but held that the respondent had only shown that it paid its own employees for work they were already due to be paid for, not that it had proved a quantifiable loss of profits or opportunity.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that the respondent was not entitled to deduct £1,300 from the claimant’s wages and ordered repayment of that gross amount, with the claimant responsible for any tax and national insurance due. It separately recorded that the parties had agreed holiday pay of £394 was outstanding and payable, but no award was made for that element because the tribunal understood it had already been paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was initially pleaded at £1,694, but the tribunal recorded that £394 holiday pay had been agreed as outstanding and later paid, leaving £1,300 in issue and awarded as the unlawful deduction. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.