Case 4104550/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v C Mason Family Butchers — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104550/2017
- Decision date
- 4 December 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R McNeilage, presented claims against C Mason Family Butchers. The tribunal recorded that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was not present and not represented at the hearing in Glasgow on 29 November 2017.
The tribunal held that, under Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994, it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's breach of contract complaint. That complaint was therefore not determined on its merits.
The tribunal did determine the redundancy pay claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,307.50 by way of redundancy pay. No separate breakdown of award components was given beyond that redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that, under Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994, it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaint of breach of contract. | Other | — | — |
| Redundancy | The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant redundancy pay of £3,307.50. | Upheld | — | £3,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,308
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.