Case 4104550/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v DVR Private Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104550/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a Rule 21 decision in which the tribunal recorded that Mr J Singh’s complaints succeeded in full on liability. The complaints listed were unfair dismissal, failure to pay holiday pay, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, arrears of wages, and failure to provide written particulars. The respondent was DVR Private Limited.
The judgment does not set out the factual background or the tribunal’s reasoning in the extracted text. It states only that those complaints succeeded and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later hearing. No figures were awarded in this judgment, and no split between the individual heads of claim was provided.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Listed in the judgment as arrears of wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.