Case 4104552/2022 · Employment Tribunal
14 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104552/2022 Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Edinburgh on December 2022 Employment Judge M A Macleod Mr David Dart v IKEA Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104552/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Macleod Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
14 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104552/2022 Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Edinburgh on December 2022 Employment Judge M A Macleod Mr David Dart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned without notice on 8 March 2022, which the Tribunal found was his effective date of termination. He contacted ACAS on 4 June 2022, received the Early Conciliation Certificate by email on 20 July 2022, and presented his Employment Tribunal claim on 17 August 2022.
The Tribunal considered why the claim was presented late. The claimant said he had tried to submit it on 14 and 15 August but received error messages. After post-hearing inquiries, the Tribunal found no evidence that the Tribunal system was unavailable at the relevant time and considered that the difficulty appeared to have arisen from the claimant including an ACAS reference number when attempting to submit the claim.
The Tribunal concluded that it had been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim within the statutory deadline. It noted that he had more than four months from the end of employment, was not prevented by illness or work from preparing the claim, and had left submission until a very late stage. The claim was therefore dismissed as time-barred for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant complained that he had been constructively unfairly dismissed. The claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time and no extension was granted. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Palmer & Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.