Case 4104559/2016 · Employment Tribunal
N M Hosie Miss J Sinclair v Represented by: Mr R Murdanaigum Solicitor Wood Group PSN Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4104559/2016
- Decision date
- 20 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N M Hosie Miss J Sinclair
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the pleaded employment claims. It recorded that on 12 April 2017 the claimant was given an opportunity to comply by 18 April 2017 with an Unless Order.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed, timeously, to comply in full with that order. On that procedural basis, it dismissed the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy was assessed or awarded, and the judgment contains no findings on the underlying allegations beyond the procedural default leading to dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dismissed under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules because the claimant failed, timeously, to comply in full with an Unless Order dated 12 April 2017. The judgment does not determine the underlying pleaded claims on their merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.