Case 4104568/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Leverage v Forward Graphics Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104568/2018
- Decision date
- 20 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Leverage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shona MacLean issued a Rule 21 judgment on the material available. The tribunal ordered Forward Graphics Ltd to pay Mr J Leverage £5,615 as damages for breach of contract for failure to give notice of termination of employment, calculated as 12 weeks' net pay at £468 per week.
The tribunal also found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £133.35, being 2 days' holiday pay after rounding, on the basis that 3.1 days had accrued and 2 days had been taken before termination. The section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim for unlawful deductions from wages was held well-founded, with an award of £468. The judgment records that the claimant had now received a redundancy payment, and it does not record any separate redundancy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for failure to give notice of termination of employment, calculated as 12 weeks' net pay at £468 per week. | Upheld | — | £5,615 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and awarded 2 days' holiday pay after rounding, based on 3.1 days accrued and 2 days taken before termination. | Upheld | — | £133 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was held well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £468 as unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £468 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant had now received a redundancy payment, but it does not make a separate award or formal determination on this point. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,216
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.