Case 4104569/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Black v Edinburgh Cleaning Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104569/2020
- Decision date
- 5 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Black
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Black was employed by Edinburgh Cleaning Services Ltd from 12 September 2019 until her resignation on 9 June 2020. The claim concerned alleged underpayment of furlough pay and wages, and the tribunal addressed the matter under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the rules of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. It noted that furlough pay under the scheme was not available where an employee carried out paid work for the employer, and that eligibility required a continuous three-week period without work.
The tribunal was not able to verify the precise furlough-pay calculation for the claimant's earlier payments and did not find that she had suffered a deduction in relation to furlough pay she had already received. It accepted that her pay varied because she did not have fixed hours, and said it was possible that the furlough figure used by the respondent was correct when calculated on the available evidence.
The tribunal found that the claimant was eligible for furlough pay up to and including 7 May 2020, but not after that date, because she resumed paid work and did not again complete a continuous three-week period without work. It accepted that Mrs Watson had mistakenly told the claimant she could both work and remain on furlough, but held that this could not create a right to furlough pay beyond what the scheme allowed.
On the arithmetic, the tribunal found that the respondent paid £650 in April 2020, later established the correct furlough figure as £579.78, deducted £70.22 in May, paid £509.56 in May, and paid nothing for June. It concluded that the claimant should have been paid for work done from 8 May onwards and for the later period in June. Overall, £2,072.51 had been paid between March and June 2020, whereas £2,131.25 should have been paid, leaving a net unlawful deduction of £58.74. The respondent was ordered to pay that amount as compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal made no finding of deduction in relation to the earlier furlough-pay calculation itself, but found a net shortfall of £58.74 after adjusting the payments made between March and June 2020. | Upheld | — | £59 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £59
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £59
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 14(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.