Case 4104574/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Morton v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4104574/2018
- Decision date
- 17 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Morton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought two disability discrimination claims against the respondents. This preliminary hearing was limited to deciding whether he was a disabled person under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at December 2017, when the alleged act of discrimination was said to have occurred.
The tribunal found that the claimant had left foot drop and moderate chronic musculo-mechanical backache. It found no evidence that the backache had an adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, but accepted that the left foot drop was long term and that the relevant assessment had to consider the effect of the impairment without the ankle/foot orthosis splint.
The tribunal accepted that without the splint the claimant would have difficulty walking outdoors, particularly on uneven ground, would be unable to carry groceries because of balance difficulties, and could not drive a manual car. It held that walking, shopping for groceries and driving were normal day-to-day activities, and that the effects were more than minor or trivial. The tribunal therefore concluded that the claimant was disabled by reason of left foot drop and directed that the case proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal determined that the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 at December 2017; the disability discrimination claims were to proceed to a final hearing and were not decided on their merits in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth 2000 IRLR 699
- Woodrup v London Borough of Southwark 2003 IRLR 111
- Anwar v Tower Hamlets College UKEAT/0091/10
- Banaszczyk v BUKA Limited UKEAT/1032/15/RN
- De Keyser v Wilson 2001 IRLR 324
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.