Case 4104595/2020 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104595/2020 v Represented by: Gordon F Bathgate Ms C Rao Angela Colvin t/a Angelas — 2021

Case reference: 4104595/2020
Decision date: 16 November 2021
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge L Doherty Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104595/2020

Respondent

Represented by: Gordon F Bathgate Ms C Rao Angela Colvin t/a Angelas

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 15 September 2021 the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to provide written reasons by 30 September 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the response should not be struck out. The respondent did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.

The tribunal therefore struck out the response under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying employment claim and does not record any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal struck out the response under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not determine the substantive claim or record any remedy.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.