Case 4104603/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104603/2020 Mr R Marston v Represented by: Briskona Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104603/2020
- Decision date
- 27 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Amanda Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104603/2020 Mr R Marston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Amanda Jones determined the case on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,339.98. That sum was identified as comprising 8.8 days holiday pay of £1,026.66, unpaid notice pay of £233.32, and unpaid pension contributions of £70 per month for four months, totalling £280.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The award was stated to be made up of 8.8 days holiday pay (£1,026.66), unpaid notice pay (£233.32), and unpaid pension contribution of £70 per month for four months (£280). | Upheld | — | £1,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,340
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.