Case 4104607/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104607/2022 Mr M Henderson v Firth Electrical and Property Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104607/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104607/2022 Mr M Henderson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. On that basis, Employment Judge G. Ian McPherson determined that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £4,513.14 net, calculated by reference to 9 weeks at £501.46 net weekly pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The redundancy payment was assessed at £5,139.00 gross, calculated as 9 weeks at £571.00 capped statutory gross weekly pay.
The hearing listed for 2 November 2022 was cancelled. The judgment is a short Rule 21 disposal and records only the two monetary awards and their calculations.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum of £4,513.14, calculated as 9 weeks x £501.46 net weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £4,513 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment in the gross sum of £5,139.00, calculated as 9 weeks x £571.00 capped statutory gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £5,139 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,652
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.