Case 4104609/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Nikolay Nikolov v Craigatin House & Courtyard Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104609/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Bradley
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nikolay Nikolov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a single claim for holiday pay. At the final hearing he clarified that he was seeking payment for holiday accrued but not taken before the end of his employment on 4 July 2022. The parties agreed his start date was 21 September 2021, his effective date of termination was 4 July 2022, his hourly rate was £10, and his weekly hours varied between about 30 and 42.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not issue a written contract or statement of main terms, and that it closed the business for certain periods and required staff to take leave on specified dates. The central dispute was when the handwritten notice of holiday dates was given to the claimant. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he first received it when he returned to work in December 2021, rather than at interview or at the end of September. On that finding, the notice was not given far enough in advance for the closure period from 2 January to 11 February 2022 to count as paid leave under regulation 15(4)(a) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Because the respondent had not identified a separate leave year, the tribunal treated the claimant's leave year as beginning on 21 September 2021. It calculated that by 4 July 2022 he had accrued 23.5 days' leave, had taken 8 days of paid leave on the dates specified by the respondent, and therefore had 15.5 days accrued but untaken and unpaid. Using a daily rate of £70 derived from weekly pay of £420, the tribunal awarded £1,085 under regulation 30(5), subject to lawful deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal held that the respondent had not given compliant notice in time for the 2 January to 11 February 2022 closure period to count as paid leave, and awarded £1,085 subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,085 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,085
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Regulation 13(3) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 15(4)(a) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 15A(2A) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(5) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.